On Nov 08, Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Seems extreme for someone who has a static ip address & has set the > > SMTP HELO to match the rDNS for that ip. Given that this is > > *precisely* what is suggested by the relevant RFCs I'm slightly > > peeved! > I'm seeing 4.7 here, nowhere near 7.7.
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on wonderland.linux.it
X-Spam-Level: *****
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HELO_DYNAMIC_DHCP,
HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR autolearn=no version=3.1.0
X-Spam-Report:
* 3.8 HELO_DYNAMIC_DHCP Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (DHCP)
* 3.9 HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (IP
addr
* 1)
* -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
* [score: 0.0000]
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
