2013/11/6 Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org>: > On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Dan S <danstowell+de...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Thanks. As discussed previously on pkg-multimedia-maintainers, I >> propose that we restrict archs for one package >> "supercollider-supernova". The package is optional for users (it's a >> non-default drop-in alternative to "supercollider-server") and there >> is very little upstream support for getting it working across archs. >> It uses some fancy coding and boost libs that I'm not familiar with, >> and these are what incur these build fails. I know it would be great >> to avoid having to special-case any archs, but I don't see where the >> expertise will come from to do this, and supercollider is >> fully-functional without that package. > > I thought sc used the problematic boost libs elsewhere so this was not > really a workable solution...
Hi all - just tested this on sparc/ppc porterboxes and the proposed fix works. I've pushed the fix to git.debian.org - please could I request a new upload, so that it's possible for the supercollider packages to go eventually to testing? Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
