On 02-11-13 10:00, Paul Gevers wrote: > [Please be aware that if you reply to a bug report, the original > reported does NOT get your message automatically.] > > On 31-10-13 23:38, Hamish wrote: >> yes, we're aware of it; sorry not much insight so far on how to fix it. >> >> also I'm a little surprised that the ppc64 and s390x big-endian error* >> seems to have fixed itself without us applying our patch-from-trunk >> to it yet. (??) >> [*] http://bugs.debian.org/672719 > > Could it be that this is fixed (or prevented automatically) in some > recent update in the tool chain? Do you want me to test this on a > porterbox? Could you point me to your patch-from-trunk patch that you > wanted to apply to fix the ppc64 and s390x FTBFS? Why did you leave that > bug open anyway? > > Paul
Hmm, were did you get the impression that ppc64 and s390x actually did build? They seem to be still failing as far as I can tell, but not blocking anything as grass has never been build successfully on those archs. Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
