victory wrote:
> Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> Template: fheroes2-pkg/post-invoke_hook-install
>> _Description: Install APT post-invoke hook?
>> Template: fheroes2-pkg/post-invoke_hook-remove
>> _Description: Remove APT post-invoke hook?
>> If activated, the APT post-invoke hook takes care of future automatic
>
> the same description on install/remove without its object,
> it may confuse users on the latter:
> If activate (=the answer is yes) the "removing hook" / "this choice" ...
>
> so, it may be better something like:
> If using the hook is activated ...
That's what the current version is intended to mean; maybe it would be
clearer if it was rearranged slightly:
The APT post-invoke hook, if activated, takes care of future automatic
upgrades of guest packages on host package upgrade. [...]
My own suggestion was that post-invoke_hook-remove should just say:
_Description: Remove APT post-invoke hook?
If the hook is disabled, no automatic upgrades will occur.
("https://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-english/2013/10/msg00040.html";)
But I didn't insist, since I'm not convinced I understand what's going
on here with these "host" and "guest" packages. If anybody does,
please explain it to me!
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
