On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:40:36AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 06:27 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:18:56AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > I think this is just like missing hardware support, which we consider an > > > important bug. And it's also a regression in support. > > > > There is no hardware involved. > > If some relatively unchangeable VM environment can only boot > gzip-compressed kernels then using xz compression means we don't support > that 'hardware'. > > > > I don't know whether it is important enough to justify using less > > > efficient compression, but AWS is a very popular platform. > > > > AWS even provides pre-built PV-GRUB with support for XZ[1], so apart > > from a menu.lst nothing else is needed. > > OK, so maybe we should provide a NEWS entry or other documentation that > this is now required. >
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/UserProvidedKernels.html was mentioned above by Bastian Blank. At http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=727736#20. That document states, in the section `Limitations of PV-GRUB', that * PV-GRUB can boot kernels compressed using the gzip, bzip2, lzo, and xz compression formats. It also states that one of the reasonss of their choice of PV-GRUB is that it understands standard grub.conf or menu.lst commands, which allows it to work with all currently supported Linux distributions. I still think there is a problem with newer Debian's kernels and xen's PV domU. I'll try to obtain access to an aws vps to boot such a kernel and get the boot log. Like I wrote, such a kernel failed with another xen commercial provider. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org