On 03/10/13 22:17, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Does this affect unstable? If so, please update the BTS accordingy, get > the fix there, and revisit the pu bug afterwards.
The change (dropping 101_nullfs_vsock.diff) was already made back in 9.1-1, and so I've updated the BTS accordingly. I agree that detail is missing from the changelog, as it was hard even for me to determine this just now. I wonder if we have an opportunity to fix the non-standard version numbering we have at the moment, perhaps by calling this pu something like 9.0-12+deb7u1 instead (because changes from 9.0-11 and -12 are already incorporated in this)? Or if it is less confusing to stay with what we have? > Why this version number? security seems to only have 9.0-10+deb70.3 There is a 9.0-10+deb70.4 upload in Secre^WSecurity Team's queue since 23 days ago but I've no idea the status if this. [rt.debian.org #4671] Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
