On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 17:17 +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > reassign 259581 ftp.debian.org > retitle 259581 RM: bbconf -- orphaned for over a year > thanks > > * Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-01 09:36]: > > retitle 259581 O: bbconf -- A Blackbox configuration utility > > noowner 259581 > > thanks > > > > >> So, We have to wait a bit to get a new fully-working version of bbconf. > > > > > > There seems to have been no CVS activity since July 16. Do you still > > > intend to adopt bbconf? > > > > I haven't heard back from you, so I'm assuming you're no longer > > interested. If you are, feel free to retitle the bug again. > > I think there has been plenty of time to give people a chance to adopt > this...
If I requested this package it's because I _really_ tried to adopt it. I
have recently got an answer from upstream:
From:
Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Bruno Barrera C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Re: BBconf.
Date:
Tue, 1 Nov 2005 10:21:41 -0500
(12:21 CLST)
On Sunday 31 July 2005 11:21, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm the Debian Maintainer of blackbox, bbkeys and bbconf.
>
> I just wanted to know when (or if) are you going to release a new
> version of bbconf to work directly with the new releases of Blackbox
and
> bbkeys (0.70 and 0.90 respectively).
Hi Bruno,
I hate to admit defeat, but I have to here. I have absolutely no time
to
devote to bbconf anymore. I had someone who said he would help me, but
nothing has happened in the last several months and I have no
inclination
that anything will anytime soon. Any spare time that I have, I tend to
spend
more on KDE-related things anyway.
So, if you need to drop bbconf from debian, I completely understand and
I
think it would probably be better that way anyway. =:/
Sorry to wait so long to admit the obvious. =:/
Thank you for waiting for me.
--
Bruno Barrera C.
"The most dangerous moment comes with victory."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
