On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 04:37:17PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Package: tex-common > >> Version: 0.8 > >> Severity: normal > >> > >> When tex-common 0.8 was installed during a routing apt-get upgrade, I was > >> asked about my changes to /etc/texmf/updmap.d/00updmap.cfg. I have not > >> changed that file and indeed did not know that it existed until now. > >> > > [...] > >> Mysterious conffile changes are one of my least favourite parts of Debian > >> :-| > > > > Same for me... Thanks for reporting and for the diff. Can you also > > send the md5sum of the old version (the file is ucf-managed)? > > Did I miss your answer, or do I have to remind you ;-)? If you don't
It appears that your question went to /dev/null somewhere. Perhaps due to backlog on master (as per Ryan Murray's d-d-a email). > have it any more, it would be useful to know from which versions of > tex-common and/or tetex-* you were upgrading - no, this is useful even > if you can provide us the md5sum. noddy:/etc/texmf/updmap.d# md5sum 00up* 3a0c2a5cab53cc6eaac66e88c3a53e24 00updmap.cfg 1243f3d8063155dd807c1716fd281446 00updmap.cfg.dpkg-old The dpkg.log would suggest that I never had tex-common installed before. 2005-11-01 13:22:06 install tex-common <none> 0.8 tetex-* was upgraded from 2.0.2c-9 to 3.0-10. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
