Hello Peter! On Thu 03 Nov 2005 16:11 +0100, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It's perfect. >> >> Another suggestion: in order to be consistent in the functions, you >> could do the same for (debian-bug-web-this-bug) and >> (debian-bug-web-this-bug-under-mouse) and you'll can get rid of >> two functions ;-) > > Good catch! Thanks!
I thought about that possibility and found that it could not be the best solution. Let me explain... If I've a function (debian-bug-web-this-bug), I can easily assign hit to a keystroke (let's say, C-x F10). OTOH, if I've (debian-bug-web-bug) which uses the bug number under point as prompt default whenever possible I cannot *easily* assign to a keystroke, because I need a new variable. Something like: (debian-bug-web-bug (&optional bug-number use-always-bug-number) and I can assign this one to a keystroke like (lambda () (debian-bug-web-bug nil t)) So, I've a dilemma: from a newbie point-of-view, I think that having single functions is the best thing, (debian-bug-web-this-bug). From a coder point-of-view, I vote for the other one. Just another view I got. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
pgpbmrkqVVsm1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
