Em SÃb, 2005-02-05 Ãs 21:12 -0500, William Ballard escreveu: > I think it should be permissible to have synaptic on one's machine and > not have sudo. synaptic depends on gksu, but doesn't require sudo to > run. sudo is a security risk -- I don't want it, but I want programs > that require the ability to su graphically. > > su and sudo are in separate packages -- for good reason.
sudo only seems to be a risk to me if you edit your /etc/sudoers in a bad way... gksudo functionality is actually built into gksu; if you look close enough you'll see. I have no plans of packaging these functionalities separately. Feel free to propose a patch or another solution if you wish; I may end up accepting it. =) Thanks, -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gustavo Noronha <http://beterraba.no-ip.org/~kov/> Debian: <http://www.debian.org/> * <http://www.debian-br.org/>
