tags 657666 + pending thanks On January 27, 2012 at 7:53PM +0000, debbugs (at xrad.org) wrote: > I recently discovered w3m's "-dump -o display_link_number=1" options, > and find them really useful. One minor niggle is that the links are > actually listed in an order quite close to, but not the same as, the > number that's displayed. So for example for one document I have, links > 1-10 are presented in the order 1-7,9,10,8 in the References list at the > end of the dump. I attach a patch which sorts them according to number.
Merged in the development repository. http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/w3m.git;a=commitdiff;h=6be1df9b9f4e02ef59f74ebdde8aed3df624f8c3 http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/w3m.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/debian On January 27, 2012 at 8:01PM +0000, debbugs (at xrad.org) wrote: > By the way, I didn't look into W3M's memory management terribly > carefully. Since it appears to use a garbage collector, I assumed that > there was no need to free in_order, but I do notice references to a > GC_free function: perhaps I should call GC_free(in_order) after all? Calling GC_free isn't needed. Thanks, -- Tatsuya Kinoshita
pgpsIi0sbQrS7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
