On Sun, 2013-07-28 at 00:47 +0000, Clint Adams wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 09:16:45PM +1300, Andrew Ruthven wrote: > > The big downside to that approach that I can see is that according to > > the changelog ischroot was implemented to *stop* people having checks > > spread all over the place. And as we've just discovered those checks > > break over time as things progress. Better to have them in one place, > > than spread around. > > I don't know; it seems pretty stupid to base script behavior on > whether one is in a "chroot" or not.
Totally agree. The problem is with tools that don't run in a chroot, if
they are in a chroot, break horribly. Mostly they're stuff run from
init.d...
--
Andrew Ruthven
Wellington, New Zealand
At home: and...@etc.gen.nz | linux.conf.au 2013
| Come join the party...
| http://linux.conf.au
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
