On 2013-06-18 22:31:27 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > True, if you attempt to upgrade, and apt-listbugs detects new bugs > potentially introduced by the upgrade, you may pin some packages, exit > and then re-attempt the upgrade. > In that case apt-listbugs is run twice in a short time interval on > similar (but not identical!) sets of packages.
If a cache mechanism is implemented, it must be per source pacakges. So, even if the sets of packages are different, one would still benefit from the cache (for the common packages). > Implementing a cache mechanism that is useful in this case, but expires > in a short time (say 500 s, or something like that) should be possible, > but a bit tricky... I suppose that it shouldn't be more difficult than caches implemented in web browsers, for instance... -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
