# as per OP report found 709950 1:1.1.dfsg-2 thanks On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Mònica Ramírez <mon...@debian.org> wrote: > found 709950 1:1.0.dfsg2-6 > thanks ... > So, it failed with fop/1:1.0.dfsg2-6, but I've tested on a mips machine > with fop/1:1.1.dfsg-2 and it is still failing with the same error. > > It's not a regression, but still a bug :-(
Thanks ! Please copy/paste the exact output as found from mips (call stack and al.) Regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
