On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:08:54PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > Thanks for the idea and the effort in making a patch of it. However, I > believe that specification allows anyone to "invent" a new "ad-hoc" > license short name for any license without a standardised name:
Yes, that's true, and furthermore the patch is buggy because it doesn't check for trailing + signs. However, I don't see a good way of catching "misguided" short names without doing something very much like this. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
