On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Ben Finney <ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > On 21-May-2013, Barry Warsaw wrote: >> On May 21, 2013, at 01:30 PM, Ben Finney wrote: >> >Barry Warsaw wrote: >> >> Can't we get coverage 3.6 into Debian, with enabled Python 3 support now? >> > >> >If you can see a way to do it without adding those libraries in the >> >package, sure. I think it would not be worthwhile to bundle them with >> >‘python-coverage’. >> >> I don't personally use any of the html stuff in coverage, so for me, if it's >> just a degradation in the html output, I won't care. Others might, but I'll >> let them fix the JavaScript packaging issues. > > That's not a solution for Debian, then. The Debian package will need to > wait for a way that works for Debian; and for now, I see the most likely > option is to get those who want this in Debian to motivate someone skilled > to package the third-party libraries needed.
I've taken a quick look at those two RFPs. libjs-jquery-hotkeys: - code.google.com page says that the development has been moved to https://github.com/jeresig/jquery.hotkeys - that github repo is a fork of https://github.com/tzuryby/jquery.hotkeys, forked about 4 years ago and not in sync - looks like compatible with jquery 1.7, but I didn't test it with 2.0 (which is not in Debian yet) libjs-jquery-isonscreen: - only has an entry on old jquery plugins website, not on the new plugins.jquery.com - doesn't seem to be compatible with jquery 1.7 I can try to package the first one (hotkeys), but probably I won't have time for it until next week. -- Dmitry Shachnev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
