On 08.05.2013 13:10, Markus Koschany wrote: > On 08.05.2013 11:44, gregor herrmann wrote: > [...] > > >> I'm not so sure here. >> It's possible to have the "old" libjgoodies-forms-java installed >> (e.g. on a wheezy system) and then to install the "new" patched >> mediathekview, which will most probably break.
Exactly. >> So I think a versioned dependency on libjgoodies-forms-java >= 1.6 >> would indeed make sense for mediathekview. > > > Well, that's true. I didn't think thoroughly enough about the "mixed > distributions" case here because this is not a problem if you use pure > sid or pure testing whereby version 1.6.0-3 of libjgoodies-forms-java > enters before mediathekview. Indeed a versioned dependency on > libjgoodies-forms-java makes sense in this case. Think version 1.6.0-3 of libjgoodies-forms-java needs to break version 1.3.0.2 of libjgoodies-common-java. Otherwise you end up with a similar exception. colliar
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
