user release.debian....@packages.debian.org
usertags 706185 + wheezy-can-defer
tags 706185 + wheezy-ignore
thanks

On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 02:35 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> libpam-ldap is a Multi-Arch: same package with shared pam configuration
> between all installed architectures of this package. Problems arise if
> more than one architecture of the package was installed and one
> architecture gets purged while one or more other architectures stay
> installed (or are in config-files-remaining state): the configuration
> gets deleted while other architectures still need it.
> 
> Consider the following sequence:
> 
>   apt-get install libpam-ldap:amd64
>   apt-get install libpam-ldap:i386
>   dpkg --purge libpam-ldap:i386
> 
> Thereafter the pam configuration originally set up by libpam-ldap:amd64
> is gone.

Whilst I would be interested in seeing a fix for this issue, I don't
believe it should be considered a blocker for the release at this point.
The fact that it's only being reported at this stage of the cycle, and
only as a result of automated testing rather than occurring on real
systems, adds to that opinion.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to