On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 16:25 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > The version of Ekiga currently in wheezy is over 2 years old (june 201), > while the 3.2 series it's following is over 3 years old. Granted, 4.0 > just came out, but from the looks of it, it's actually *more* stable > than the 3.2 release. > > I understand that the diff is huge, and this would be a major exception, > but I think it's something that should seriously be > considered. Otherwise Ekiga should be considered from removal from > wheezy, as there is no way security patches can be maintained for that > old release onwards.
Huge is accurate; even my attempts at filtering the diffs for a couple of the packages still left several kLOCS of diff. :-( I realise we haven't particularly helped by not replying earlier; I suspect that was largely because we were also unsure what to do for the best. For reference, removing ekiga, opal and ptlib would also require dropping gnugk, h323plus, openam and t38modem. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
