On 04/16/2013 01:05 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Since this case (xbrlapi not started) is only an inconvenience for the > user, not a stopper, I guess we would target r1, not r0?
This change is trivial and fixes an important bug so it might be accepted for r0. Regards, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
