Hello! On Mon 24 Oct 2005 22:49 +0200, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > It has been closed by one of the developers, namely > Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
This morning, manually installing slime/cl-swank (from incoming.d.o),
I realised that my patch was half-correct: slime should depends on
cl-swank, but the dependency is strict (as for wine/libwine).
It means that you cannot install
slime-20051023-1
cl-swank-20051015-1
but you should install the same version for both.
So, the slime dependency is
cl-swank (= ${Source-Version})
Attached a patch versus the darcs repository.
Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
PS, I don't know how to act in such a case: should I reopen the bug?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
New patches:
[debian/control: depends on the same version of cl-swank
Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>**20051025090443
My previous patch was half-correct: slime should depends on
cl-swank, but the dependency is strict (as for wine/libwine).
It means that you cannot install
slime-20051023-1
cl-swank-20051015-1
but you should install the same version for both.
] {
hunk ./debian/changelog 3
- - * token new verion
+ * Patch from luca -at- pca -dot- it:
+ Depends on the same version of cl-swank, really closing #335489.
hunk ./debian/control 12
- -Depends: emacsen-common, cl-swank
+Depends: emacsen-common, cl-swank (= ${Source-Version})
}
Context:
[token new version
Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[TAG DEBIAN_slime_1:20051023-1
Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Patch bundle hash:
3656bbdaecb31165eeab77d32826ed6af4df1f03
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDXfkLVAp7Xm10JmkRAjYYAJsGFG0dPN1ChhhuUzNirqOSMhecyQCbB3uB
27GSdLWgTfgnyf5QwlKLAcw=
=hRSw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
pgpVRS3Pn6KEa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
