On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 03:01:29AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2013-03-25 22:23:18 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > But *PACKAGE BUILD ENVIRONMENT* is not the same thing as the user's > > normal shell working environment. We must use sanitized build > > environment. > > > > I think this is what you are missing. Now i have better idea what kind > > of precaution words to use. > > This is exactly what this bug report is about: maint-guide should > suggest to use debuild (which sanitizes the build environment) > rather than dpkg-buildpackage (which doesn't sanitize it).
Hmmm... may be I did not make myself clear enough. I think use of *debuild* is not enough! I have no intent to give people a false sense of sanitization. There are much more than just using the debuild. So learning to use dpkg-buildpackage properly is what I call requirement for the proper *PACKAGE BUILD ENVIRONMENT*. If you find a DD other than you supporting your idea to push the use of debuild over dpkg-buildpackage, let me know. I will reconsider my position. Osamu PS: The package building under the easiest automatically sanitized environment is to use *pdebuild*. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
