On 2013-03-18 21:53, Evgeni Golov wrote: > The MPL-2.0 contains the following paragraph: > 1.12. "Secondary License" > means either the GNU General Public License, Version 2.0, the GNU > Lesser General Public License, Version 2.1, the GNU Affero General > Public License, Version 3.0, or any later versions of those > licenses. > > This, of course, matches "m/GNU General Public License/i or m/\bGPL\b/" > and gets the copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl tag, > even when the copyright never ever mentiones the GPL directly. > > Let's add the "means either..." phrase to the list of known false-positives. > > [...]
Thanks, applied. It is my understanding this does not cover all the false-positives mentioned so I have not tagged the bug pending. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
