On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 15:31:39 +1300, Olly Betts wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 08:34:36PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> > A partial "bisection" of python-subversion via snapshot.debian.org
> > shows that the problem already existed in -3.1 but did not exist in
> > -1. I did not test -2 and -3 yet.
> > 
> > -2 has swig-related changes:
> > 
> > * patches/swig2-compat: New patch from upstream to build with swig 2.x.
> >      (Closes: #634049)
> > 
> > However, it may well be that this change is actually caused by Debian
> > having migrated to Swig 2, too.
> 
> I believe this is due to a bug in SWIG which was fixed upstream in 2.0.7:
> 
> 2012-05-22: szager
>             [python] Disambiguate SWIG_From_unsigned_SS_int and 
> SWIG_From_unsigned_SS_long.
> 
> This was r13106 in SWIG's SVN repo (now migrated to git, but I don't have
> the corresponding git commit hash to hand).
> 
> Testing already has SWIG 2.0.7, so rebuilding python-subversion should fix
> this if SWIG is run during the build.
> 
I'm going to upload a new subversion build to wheezy.  No source
changes, this would be a binNMU if it weren't for multiarch breakage.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to