On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 06:05:45AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > tags 297923 patch > thanks
> In this bug Martin F. Krafft mentions that different versions of
> libpam-smbpass and samba-common on the same system lead to a big mess.
> Martin's suggestion in this bug report seems fair to me. I hesitated
> between the following two solutions for libpam-smbpass:
> -Add "samba-common (= ${Source-Version})" to Depends
> -Add "samba-common (<<${Source-Version}) to Conflicts
> I finally choosed the latter, which seems less invasive to me and
> avoids enforcing users of libpmam-smbpass to install samba-common.
libpam-smbpass should have a dependency on samba-common anyway, because it
uses /etc/samba/smb.conf as its config file and this is owned by
samba-common. << conflicts are also *very* disruptive on major upgrades.
We should do this using the first option instead.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
