Le dimanche 10 février 2013 13:36:43, Thomas Preud'homme a écrit : > Le dimanche 10 février 2013 12:24:16, Santiago Vila a écrit : > > The idea of checking the size, I think, is to prevent the list server > > from replying to messages which are "obviously of a wrong size". > > I see. The problem is to determine what is a wrong size then. For instance, > GPG signature will only grow with time so this value would need to be > adapted from time to time (not a big deal, the evolution is not too fast). > Also it seems several other factors can apply. I have 2 examples without > gpg signature which are of respective size: 8414 and 17150 bytes.
Oups sorry. For the second one I failed to compute the correct size: it is the size of the email + 2 answers. The real size is 12870. So I suppose 16384 would be fine. My mistake. > > > Can you check if 8192 would work for you? > > Unfortunetely no it doesn't. It seems in my case it should be at least > 18000 bytes (I'd go up to 20000 at least to be safe). So 16384 would make me happy. I still think smartlist should not do this check but as long as the software works for me, I don't care too much. > > Best regards, > > Thomas Best regards, Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
