On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 06:24:07PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I'm all for one configuration variant but shouldn't that be fastcgi?

Yeah sure, but look at your options:

                        | cgi       | fastcgi
------------------------+-----------+----------------
/munin-cgi              | ok        | static goes 403
/cgi-bin/munin-cgi-html | no static | no static

I'd say the cgi variant is slightly more useful even though it consumes
more resources. What do you think?

Helmut


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to