On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 06:24:07PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I'm all for one configuration variant but shouldn't that be fastcgi?
Yeah sure, but look at your options:
| cgi | fastcgi
------------------------+-----------+----------------
/munin-cgi | ok | static goes 403
/cgi-bin/munin-cgi-html | no static | no static
I'd say the cgi variant is slightly more useful even though it consumes
more resources. What do you think?
Helmut
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]