Hi Tim, Thanks a lot! I'll wait for your next revision of this patch, as we've just discussed IRL.
Bye, Joost On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 11:11:40AM +0000, Tim Marston wrote: > --- en/upgrading.dbk (revision 9557) > +++ en/upgrading.dbk (working copy) > @@ -1227,6 +1227,31 @@ > may be required, either before or during the upgrade; these are detailed > below on a per-package basis. > </para> > +<section id="issues-sudo"> > +<title>Sudo</title> > +<para> > +If you have modified <filename>/etc/sudoers</filename> then you should be > aware > +of changes made to how <systemitem role="package">sudo</systemitem> > +configuration is handled. The deafult <filename>/etc/sudoers</filename> now > +includes the following directive: > +</para> > +<programlisting>#includedir /etc/sudoers.d</programlisting> > +<para> > +You may wish to add this directive to the end of your > +<filename>/etc/sudoers</filename>, as this won't be done automatically during > +the upgrade. And you may also wish to consider migrating your changes to > files > +in the new <filename>/etc/sudoers.d</filename> directory. > +</para> > +<note> > +<para> > +Unless you also add a <literal>Defaults secure_path=</literal> entry to your > +modified <filename>/etc/sudoers</filename>, you may find that <systemitem > +role="package">sudo</systemitem> has an incomplete path. Specifying the > fully > +qualified path to commands will still work, however. See > +<filename>usr/share/doc/sudo/NEWS.Debian</filename> for more information. > +</para> > +</note> > +</section> > <section id="issues-evolution"> > <title>Evolution</title> > <para> > > -- > Tim Marston > ed.am > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130127111140.ga16...@waxworlds.org > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
