On 26/01/13 12:19, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 22:56:52 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: >> ats-lang-anairiats_0.2.6-1 \ > > version mismatch (sid has 0.2.9-1, wheezy 0.2.3-1)
0.2.9-1 is OK, it was uploaded pretty recently. 0.2.3-1 needs a binNMU in wheezy, I think I asked for that in a separate list in the same mail. >> nmu \ sigx_2.0.2-1 . armel . \ -m 'Rebuild against GLib 2.32, see >> #694525' >> > FTBFS: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sigx&arch=armel&ver=2.0.2-1%2Bb2&stamp=1359200243 I did wonder whether that would happen. I'm opening a FTBFS bug against sigx; it looks as though it might be fixable by throwing cast operators at the problem. Failing that, sigx is a library with no reverse dependencies (and no new upstream release since 2009), so removal from testing seems a reasonable fallback option. S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
