Bug#658739: status?

[Brian Kroth]

Brian Paul Kroth <bpkr...@gmail.com> 2013-01-09 12:32:

Andreas Metzler <ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org> 2013-01-09 19:17:

On 2013-01-09 Brian Kroth <bpkr...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]

May I ask what the proposed/potential solutions for this is then?
This is a major problem holding us up from serious wheezy
consideration where I work.

Please let me know if you'd like help testing something.

Hello,

sadly I have not got a plan. The Ubuntu change did not work out, it
fixed one issue but opened others. The only obvious workaround is to
use libnss-ldapd instead of libnss-ldap.

cu andreas

Hi, unfortunately, as I outlined here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658896


Thanks,
Brian

libnss-ldapd (or rather libpam-ldapd) is not an option for us, nor does it solve the problem (I've tested it).

Sorry, that should have been here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658896#23

We use that pam_ldap config= trick for all sorts of things/services.

Thanks,
Brian

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature