On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:08:29AM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 12:28:09PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > > If you accept this change, it supersedes #693788. > > At first glance it looks fine. However, it conflicts since I > applied #693788 already. > > I'll review it properly tomorrow.
OK - do you want me to rebase and apply it, given my new-found commit bit? I'm pretty comfortable with its accuracy at this point, since I've been using it in http://people.canonical.com/~cjwatson/cross/armhf/raring/ and in a number of local tests. Thanks, -- Colin Watson [[email protected]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
