Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> (20/12/2012):
> Is there any merit to checking the result there (i.e. actually
> looking at err)?
> 
> In any case, it looks like that's the style already used for the
> other options. Please go ahead; thanks. Adding the obligatory CC for
> a d-i ack.

Looking at it briefly, two points I thought I'd mention:
 - We have update-initramfs triggers so it looks like parts of the
   (updated) debdiff could go away.
 - You have a double return, which is a bit awkward. ;-)

Besides, I'll be happy to see such a bugfix for wheezy.

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to