On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 10:25 PM, The Wanderer <wande...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > Package: libjack-dev > Version: 1:0.121.3+20120418git75e3e20b-2.1 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > When I attempt to dist-upgrade to current testing, apt wants to remove > libjack0 > and install libjack-jackd2-0. This is fine; the latter explicitly Provides: > the > same virtual package as the former, so presumably this is part of an > intended > package transition.
Is this expected to happen? Does anything strictly depend on jack2? > > As part of the same dist-upgrade, apt wants to remove libjack-dev, but does > not > attempt to install libjack-jackd2-dev. This is not fine. Maybe we should convert libjack-dev to a dummy package like jackd. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org