Hi, no need to cc: on mails to the fai-BTS, i'm subscribed to the package fai... ;-)
On Monday 17 October 2005 16:55, you wrote:
> But properly fixing #320024 certainly demands a solution similar to my
> suggestion, which is #329547.
As said: maybe we dont want to properly fix #320024, because a proper fix (as
is required by #329547) might not be accepted in sarge.
And if Thomas now uploads a 2.8.4.1 which fixes #320024, #329547 will also be
closed. (Or maybe #320024 does not gets closed as the bugs are merged, not
100% sure.)
That's all I wanted to say.
> Thus I'd say this merge was not that wrong;
> but if it was, anyone is free to unmerge these bugs.
I never said it was wrong. I only said it might be wrong depending on our
target ;)
regards,
Holger
pgptmVCFnHqT3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
