On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 16:36 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > A quick note first, as I noticed the subject was updated to reference > 0.8.8... That version isn't a valid candidate right now in any case, as > it FTBFS on approximately half the architectures - see > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=python-apt
Any news on that? > On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 09:14 +0200, Michael Vogt wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 01:48:52PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > > 2012/9/3 Michael Vogt <m...@debian.org>: > >I would slightly > > prefer 0.8.8 as the auth.py module is IMO a good idea compared to > > having multiple apps duplicating this code in various places. > > Whilst I agree that reducing code duplication is generally a good thing, > for wheezy the practical difference is presumably none given that > nothing outside of python-apt itself would be using the code? Did I miss anything here? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
