>>>>> "LZ" == Lei Zhang <[email protected]> writes:
LZ> IMO, if you are going to keep fujitsu.c, it's better to just
LZ> replace to remove the scansnap backend altogether. It is just a
LZ> duplicate of the epson backend.
I can see some differences between the two backends, they don't look
like duplicates.
LZ> FWIW, I took Javier's patch and removed the Epson scanner USB
LZ> IDs, and it worked fine for me. I imagine without the Epson IDs,
LZ> it would not interfere with Epson scanners.
Dropping support for Epson scanners supported in snapscan backend is not
a solution.
Please note some Epson scanners are different than other ones.
E.g. in SANE some Epson scanners must be run with epson backend while
other with snapscan backend.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
