On Saturday, 16. June 2012 22:36:29 Joey Hess wrote: > I was thinking that there might be packages from the same source as > others, that Provide them, and tighter dependencies would prevent > being installed.
Provides should not be a problem here, because we need a strict dependency on a real package to ensure the /u/s/d/PKG symlink is not dangling. Or is it allowed to install * /usr/share/doc/FOO/copyright (where FOO is *not* the name of a binary package) * /usr/share/doc/VIRTUAL/copyright (where VIRTUAL is a purely virtual package) and then have /usr/share/doc/$PKG > FOO (or VIRTUAL)? Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
