disregard point #3 regarding `laptop-mode status` output, because even
though I have configured idle timeout 0:
# We don't want spin-down (Start_Stop_Count)
CONTROL_HD_IDLE_TIMEOUT=0
.. I've also configured:
# Should laptop mode tools control the hard drive power management settings?
CONTROL_HD_POWERMGMT="auto"
# 128 = Highest power-management without allowing spin-downs
BATT_HD_POWERMGMT=128
LM_AC_HD_POWERMGMT=128
NOLM_AC_HD_POWERMGMT=254

But that information could actually be retrieved (if I'm forced to run
`/etc/init.d/laptop-mode status` as root anyway):
$ sudo /sbin/hdparm -I /dev/sda | grep "power management level:"
    Advanced power management level: 128

So the following statement is incorrect (So long as I'm required to run
`laptop-mode status` as root):
(NOTE: drive settings affected by Laptop Mode cannot be retrieved.)

---

Now another issue:

$ sudo /etc/init.d/laptop-mode stop
[....] Disabling laptop mode...mount: /dev/cgroup/cpu is busy
done (disabled, not active).

Why is LMT messing with /dev/cgroup/cpu?

$ grep ^PARTITIONS /etc/laptop-mode/laptop-mode.conf
PARTITIONS="auto"

$ egrep -r '^(CONTROL|ENABLE)_.*=1' /etc/laptop-mode/conf.d
/etc/laptop-mode/conf.d/auto-hibernate.conf:ENABLE_AUTO_HIBERNATION=1
/etc/laptop-mode/conf.d/terminal-blanking.conf:CONTROL_TERMINAL=1
/etc/laptop-mode/conf.d/start-stop-programs.conf:CONTROL_START_STOP=1


--jas


On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Jasmine Hassan <[email protected]>wrote:

> Another obvious issue:
> ----
> $ less /etc/laptop-mode/laptop-mode.conf
> $ grep ENABLE_LAPTOP_MODE_ON /etc/laptop-mode/laptop-mode.conf
> ENABLE_LAPTOP_MODE_ON_BATTERY=1
> ENABLE_LAPTOP_MODE_ON_AC=0
> $ cat /sys/class/power_supply/ACAD/online
> 1
> $ sudo /usr/sbin/laptop_mode auto
>
> Laptop mode
> enabled, active [unchanged]
> -----
>
> Why is it active, even after running `laptop_mode auto`, if I didn't
> ENABLE_LAPTOP_MODE_ON_AC, and am on AC?
>
> This is laptop_mode with your proposed patch applied.
>
> --jas
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Jasmine Hassan <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Now the superfluous, yet unsatisfying output of `/etc/init.d/laptop-mode
>> status` -- below the comments.
>>
>> 1. The first line says "Laptop mode status:", but it doesn't tell me
>> whether LMT is active/inactive, enabled/disabled.
>>
>> 2. LMT has nothing to do with how sysfs, proc, udev, debugfs, etc. are
>> mounted. Therefore, it shouldn't be printing all mounts.
>>
>> I have in the config:
>> CONTROL_NOATIME=0
>> LM_BATT_MAX_LOST_WORK_SECONDS=600
>> LM_AC_MAX_LOST_WORK_SECONDS=360
>>
>> So, I expect `laptop-mode status` to only show me mounts that have their
>> commit value changed by LMT. This is much easier to read, than having to
>> look through 14 long lines to determine which 2 lines are affected by LMT,
>> and then look for the commit value in each of them.
>> And if you want to be a little more verbose, you could just tell me that
>> LMT is not configured to manage (REL|NO)ATIME.
>>
>> 3. In the config, I have:
>> CONTROL_HD_IDLE_TIMEOUT=0
>> Which tells LMT not to control the hard drive idle timeout settings. So,
>> I shouldn't be seeing output about drive status, nor a note that LMT drive
>> settings cannot be retrieved, because I configured LMT not to manage drive
>> idle timeout.
>>
>> 4. "LMT allowed to run, enabled file exists". This probably doesn't
>> concern most end-users, as they don't ever directly interact with this file.
>>
>> 5. I don't have LMT cpufreq module enabled, and ENABLE_AUTO_MODULES=0 is
>> set in LMT config. Again, it shouldn't be printing information about
>> something it is not managing.
>>
>> Also, if I enabled cpufreq, there surely must be a more user-friendly way
>> of displaying various information:
>> a. not having to scroll through so many lines, for each cpu's min/amx/cur
>> frequency,
>> b. frequencies in MHz (instead of default Hz),
>> c. I probably don't need to see scaling_governor for each cpu core, if
>> they're all the same (often the case)
>>
>> ----
>>
>> $ sudo /etc/init.d/laptop-mode status
>> Laptop mode status:
>>
>> Mounts:
>>    sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
>>    proc on /proc type proc (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
>>    udev on /dev type devtmpfs
>> (rw,relatime,size=10240k,nr_inodes=492916,mode=755)
>>    devpts on /dev/pts type devpts
>> (rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000)
>>    /dev/disk/by-uuid/56dd2ec2-7c29-4fdc-a531-ab6f83fa6e04 on / type ext4
>> (rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,commit=360,data=ordered)
>>    tmpfs on /var/run type tmpfs
>> (rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,size=395532k,mode=755)
>>    tmpfs on /var/run/lock type tmpfs
>> (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,size=5120k)
>>    tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,size=791060k)
>>    tmpfs on /var/run/shm type tmpfs
>> (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,size=791060k)
>>    fusectl on /sys/fs/fuse/connections type fusectl (rw,relatime)
>>    /dev/sda7 on /media/data type fuseblk
>> (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,allow_other,blksize=4096)
>>    debugfs on /sys/kernel/debug type debugfs (rw,relatime)
>>    binfmt_misc on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc
>> (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
>>    cgroup on /dev/cgroup/cpu type cgroup
>> (rw,relatime,cpu,release_agent=/usr/local/sbin/cgroup_clean)
>>
>> Drive power status:
>>
>>    /dev/sda:
>>     drive state is:  active/idle
>>
>> (NOTE: drive settings affected by Laptop Mode cannot be retrieved.)
>>
>> Readahead states:
>>    /dev/disk/by-uuid/56dd2ec2-7c29-4fdc-a531-ab6f83fa6e04: 6144 kB
>>    /dev/sda7: 6144 kB
>>
>> Laptop Mode Tools is allowed to run: /var/run/laptop-mode-tools/enabled
>> exists.
>>
>> /proc/sys/vm/laptop_mode:
>>    5
>>
>> /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio:
>>    60
>>
>> /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio:
>>    1
>>
>> /proc/sys/vm/dirty_expire_centisecs:
>>    36000
>>
>> /proc/sys/vm/dirty_writeback_centisecs:
>>    36000
>>
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_cur_freq:
>>    1200000
>>
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_max_freq:
>>    2501000
>>
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_min_freq:
>>    1200000
>>
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq/cpuinfo_cur_freq:
>>    1200000
>>
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq/cpuinfo_max_freq:
>>    2501000
>>
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq/cpuinfo_min_freq:
>>    1200000
>>
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/cpufreq/cpuinfo_cur_freq:
>>    2501000
>>
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/cpufreq/cpuinfo_max_freq:
>>    2501000
>>
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/cpufreq/cpuinfo_min_freq:
>>    1200000
>>
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/cpufreq/cpuinfo_cur_freq:
>>    1200000
>>
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/cpufreq/cpuinfo_max_freq:
>>    2501000
>>
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/cpufreq/cpuinfo_min_freq:
>>    1200000
>>
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor:
>>    ondemand
>>
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq/scaling_governor:
>>    ondemand
>>
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/cpufreq/scaling_governor:
>>    ondemand
>>
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/cpufreq/scaling_governor:
>>    ondemand
>>
>> /proc/acpi/button/lid/LID0/state:
>>    state:      closed
>>
>> /sys/class/power_supply/ACAD/online:
>>    1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Jasmine Hassan 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Ritesh,
>>>
>>> Another thing:
>>>
>>> $ /etc/init.d/laptop-mode status
>>> Laptop mode status:
>>>
>>> /usr/sbin/laptop_mode: 1175: /usr/sbin/laptop_mode: cannot create
>>> /var/lock/lmt-req.lock: Permission denied
>>>
>>> Do I really need to be root to get the status of LMT? Why are we
>>> creating a lock file when all we want is get the status of LMT?
>>>
>>> --jas
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Jasmine Hassan <[email protected]
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > The problem seemed to be caused because we were exiting if LMT was
>>>> disabled
>>>> > in the config file. Attached patch should help improve your use case.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> Yes, that is one of the problems. If I may suggest, to be more
>>>> user-proof:
>>>> change:
>>>> echo "$ENABLE_LAPTOP_MODE" |grep y
>>>> to:
>>>> echo "$ENABLE_LAPTOP_MODE" | egrep -i "(y|1)"
>>>>
>>>> Though, there's no /etc/default/laptop-mode installed on debian by LMT
>>>> 1.61-1
>>>>
>>>> > But I would like to change the way LMT invokes. Currently it is a
>>>> hodge
>>>> > podge of /var/run/laptop-mode-tools/enabled and ENABLE_LMT settings.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, please.
>>>>
>>>> > * When invoked through init scripts, it touched the "enabled" file,
>>>> then
>>>> > called LMT, realized that ENABLE_LMT  was set to 0 and it exited. But
>>>> it did
>>>> > not clean the "enabled" file. For that, I proposed the change in one
>>>> of the
>>>> > previous emails.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, that was the initial issue I was reporting.
>>>>
>>>> > * When invoked through udev, we do not care or create the "enabled"
>>>> file.
>>>>
>>>> I had more issues with the default udev rules file added by LMT.
>>>> For that, I had overridden it in
>>>> /etc/udev/rules.d/99-laptop-mode.rules, with comments, as I intended
>>>> to report this to you as well (way back) and totally forgot.
>>>>
>>>> # /lib/udev/power-lmt-udev runs both lmt & pm-powersave
>>>> SUBSYSTEM=="power_supply", ENV{POWER_SUPPLY_ONLINE}=="0",
>>>> RUN+="/lib/udev/power-lmt-udev"
>>>> SUBSYSTEM=="power_supply", ENV{POWER_SUPPLY_ONLINE}=="1",
>>>> RUN+="/lib/udev/power-lmt-udev"
>>>>
>>>> # Laptop-mode-tools default rules below, and reasons for disabling them
>>>>
>>>> # This generates 2 events, running script(s) twice. No good!
>>>> #ACTION=="change", SUBSYSTEM=="power_supply", RUN+="/lib/udev/lmt-udev
>>>> auto"
>>>> # What is machinecheck? See: http://www.researchut.com/site/node/158
>>>> # We don't need it as we're handling LMT from
>>>> /etc/pm/sleep.d/01_laptop-mode-tools
>>>> #ACTION=="add|remove", SUBSYSTEM=="machinecheck",
>>>> RUN+="/lib/udev/lmt-udev auto"
>>>> # We're also not using LMT's usb-autosuspend module
>>>> #ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="usb", RUN+="/lib/udev/lmt-udev force
>>>> modules=usb-autosuspend devices=%k"
>>>>
>>>> => LMT is also adding hooks for acpid in /etc/acpi/(actions|events)
>>>> and hooks for upower in (/etc/power/scripts.d|events.d) and even hooks
>>>> for the antiquated apmd in /etc/apm/event.d/ , even though it's not
>>>> even installed on my system.
>>>>
>>>> i.e. All over the place. This caused me some grief.
>>>> udev+acpid+upowerd. Quite excessive I must say.
>>>> I had to edit each of the three lm_* files in /etc/acpi/events/, and
>>>> comment out the two lines in each of them.
>>>>
>>>> So, can't this be better managed via a postinst script? Say it would:
>>>> 1. detect available facilities (pm-utils/udev/acpid/upowerd/apmd),
>>>> pick one and only one, based on an ordered LMT preference list. Warn
>>>> the user if none of the recommended facilities are installed/enabled.
>>>> This could be later fixed by the user via dpkg-reconfigure
>>>> laptop-mode-tools, or whatever.
>>>> 2. create symlinks to a common startup directory, say
>>>> /usr/share/laptop-mode-tools/startup-hooks/*, for event/script hooks
>>>> applicable to the chosen, available facility.
>>>>
>>>> > With ENABLE_LMT=1, we get
>>>> >
>>>> > rrs@champaran:~$ sudo /usr/sbin/laptop_mode auto
>>>> > Warning: Configuration file
>>>> /etc/laptop-mode/conf.d/board-specific/*.conf is
>>>> > not readable, skipping.
>>>> > Laptop mode enabled
>>>> > active [unchanged]
>>>>
>>>> N.B. in my pre-last email I attached a little patch that amends this
>>>> output. I really disliked getting two separate lines for each LMT
>>>> invocation in my pm-* logs, for only a few words.
>>>> The warning about board-specific conf is also quite annoying. What use
>>>> is "board-specific", as a (non-existent by default) sub-directory of
>>>> "conf.d", if "conf.d" itself already serves the purpose of a dynamic
>>>> user-configuration-include directory? There's also no mention of it in
>>>> the laptop-mode.conf manpage.
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > With "enabled" file removed, it shows:
>>>> >
>>>> > rrs@champaran:~$ sudo rm /var/run/laptop-mode-tools/enabled
>>>> > rrs@champaran:~$ sudo /usr/sbin/laptop_mode auto
>>>> >
>>>> > Warning: Configuration file
>>>> /etc/laptop-mode/conf.d/board-specific/*.conf is
>>>> > not readable, skipping.
>>>> > Laptop mode
>>>> > disabled,
>>>> > not active [unchanged]
>>>> >
>>>> > So it just disabled LMT because it was not "enabled".
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > And if "enabled" is set again, things go right.
>>>> >
>>>> > rrs@champaran:~$ sudo touch /var/run/laptop-mode-tools/enabled
>>>> > rrs@champaran:~$ sudo /usr/sbin/laptop_mode auto
>>>> >
>>>> > Warning: Configuration file
>>>> /etc/laptop-mode/conf.d/board-specific/*.conf is
>>>> > not readable, skipping.
>>>> > Laptop mode
>>>> > enabled, active
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> Doesn't this fundamentally conflict with the purpose of "auto"?
>>>> Per the laptop_mode man-page:
>>>> auto      Enable or disable laptop mode based on the current power
>>>> state. Note that this will not do anything if the laptop-mode  service
>>>> has not been started!
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > There are 2 items to fix.
>>>> >
>>>> > * Invocation
>>>> > * Status
>>>> >
>>>> > If you have time, you can review the patch and do some tests. Let me
>>>> know.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> And laptop_mode cleanups.. At the very least, lots of very old,
>>>> deprecated "backwards-compatibility" stuff needs to go.
>>>>
>>>> I'm sorry, but overall, I really don't like the current state of LMT.
>>>> And although I have all power-management stuff scripted in a pm-utils
>>>> power.d script, I still find LMT useful for the disabling of
>>>> data-sensitive feature and the (system-level) auto-hibernate at
>>>> configurable low and critical battery levels (without polling)
>>>> feature.
>>>>
>>>> LMT needs much more love than the patch you propose.
>>>>
>>>> Hope I'm not being too harshly critical.
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Ritesh Raj Sarraf
>>>> > RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
>>>> > "Necessity is the mother of invention."
>>>>
>>>> Kind Regards,
>>>> Jasmine
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to