Am Freitag, den 12.10.2012, 16:48 +1100 schrieb Dmitry Smirnov: > The license in question have exactly one (first) clause of BSD family > licenses. > > Parahraphs 2,3,4 are different and I can't tell if some of them may be > considered as legal equivalents to any clauses of BSD-2-clause, BSD-3-clause > or BSD-4-clause licenses. > > Actually paragraphs 2 and 3 are taken from zlib license: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zlib_License > > Therefore I think it is not a BSD license at all. I'm not sure how it should > be called.
It should not be called BSD-x-clause license. It is a new license, but not a BSD license. licensecheck should detect it as UNKNOWN or at most as derived from BSD. -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
