Quoting Khaled Hosny (khaledho...@eglug.org): > Right, and I checked other fonts-* package and there is indeed large > inconsistency and I can’t tell what is the rule for including or > omitting foundry name, it seems random.
(dropping individuals from CC list, I guess all are subscribed to one or another of the destinations) Yes, we've been inconsistent. Mostly because our "specification" has been built over trial and error and we probably didn't really consider all possible cases. I'm balanced about the value added by including the foundry name in the package name. The current practice is more to use one when the foundry is really something that can be called this way. The case where thefoundry is an individual is probably a case where we would choose to *not* include a foundry name, unless the said individual insists that his|her name to be mentioned in the package name. So, yeah, we probably misnnamed your fonts, Khaled..:-)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
