tags 688041 + upstream
thanks
Instead of whining why on earth don't you read through old bug reports where
the position has been stated many times.
Please go ahead and propose a splitting instead pf whining, a splitting that
will be accepted upstream.
We had too many of you crying put without ever coming up with real proposals.
Especially remarks like "in the light of several-year-ignored ..." disqualify
you the moment I read them. Check the packaging history to see that we are
doing what we can. And if the Genius in you can come up with good solutions for
the "several-year-ignored bugs", we would be happy.
But I doubt your capacity on that!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norbert Preining preining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012/10/03, at 21:13, Thomas Kremer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> It's been two weeks now and there's no response yet.
>
> Did you read this bug report?
>
> In light of the several-years-ignored other bug reports in this package,
> I would greatly appreciate some feedback on the reception of this one.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas Kremer
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
