On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:26:47 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Adam, > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 07:23:00AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > There seems to be some confusion here. sitplus is _not_ in testing. It > > hasn't been in testing since June. > > Uhmmm, sorry for the confusion. I never realised that it was removed. > (I think I even somehow ignored one of your hints about this fact in the > past because I was somehow sure that it was in ...) > > I can only tell for sure that sitplus was in testing at the point of > creation of the Debian Med metapackages because it is recommended in > med-rehabilitation. This was in April and we did not recieved any RC > bug against sitplus so I did not checked - perhaps it was just removed > because of the missing Dependency. > It was removed because of #650059.
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
