On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 23:10 +0200, Werner Detter wrote: > The policyd-weight package in stable should be updated as it still uses a > non functional DNSBL. Furthermore the DNSBL's from rfc-ignorant.org will > be shut down on 2012-11-30 (the announcement from the lists operator can > be found here: http://rfc-ignorant.org/endofanera.php) > > To prevent false positives with those DNSBL's I'd like to update the stable > package. I've backported two patches from the policyd-weight package in > in unstable/testing: > > 03_del_non_func_ipv6_dnsbl.dpatch > 04_del_rfc-ignorant.org.patch.dpatch
Thanks. > debdiff policyd-weight_0.1.15.1-2.dsc policyd-weight_0.1.15.1-2+squeeze1.dsc > diff -u policyd-weight-0.1.15.1/debian/changelog > policyd-weight-0.1.15.1/debian/changelog > --- policyd-weight-0.1.15.1/debian/changelog > +++ policyd-weight-0.1.15.1/debian/changelog [...] > diff -r patches//00list > /home/werner/policyd-weight-0.1.15.1/debian/patches//00list > 2a3,4 > > 03_del_non_func_ipv6_dnsbl.dpatch > > 04_del_rfc-ignorant.org.patch.dpatch > Only in /home/werner/policyd-weight-0.1.15.1/debian/patches/: > 03_del_non_func_ipv6_dnsbl.dpatch > Only in /home/werner/policyd-weight-0.1.15.1/debian/patches/: > 04_del_rfc-ignorant.org.patch.dpatch That looks a little odd. Those changes should be included in the debdiff. If you unpack the new .dsc, does the result include the patches? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
