On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> The freeze came to early to consider v6 for stable, so I'm planning on
> having the current version (5.8.x) in wheezy. It seems to run reasonably
> stable and reliable and I haven't received a bug report which indicates
> otherwise.
>
> If one of the new features in v6 or v7 is important enough, I will
> consider providing backports.

Fair enough, but I wasn't thinking of wheezy.

The original post mentions 'experimental' as a start point for v6,
doesn't it?  So, 'experimental' and then 'unstable' would make sense.


Cheers,

-- 
Cristian


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to