26.07.2012, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Michael Gilbert]
>> Make sure to file an unblock request bug for the release team to
>> review.
> I doubt they will want it at this point.  I should have thought of this
> earlier: the new lesstif2 causes FTBFSs in dependent packages.  I don't
> know how many yet, as my workstation is still test-building them, but
> I've already patched one package, mtink, and there's a couple more
> failed build logs I haven't investigated yet.
>

31.07.2012, Peter Samuelson wrote (on debian-release):
> There is no need to remove gromacs in order for lesstif2 to migrate.
> There's no SONAME bump or anything.  The issue only came up at all,
> because we needed to make sure the new lesstif2 does not add any new
> FTBFS in other packages.
>
> Peter

The second message sounds more optimistic. Did you check the other
reverse dependencies? Do you think it's time for an unblock request?

If this can't be fixed for wheezy, which packages have to be removed
from ia32-libs?

Best,
Tobias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to