Hello Christian,

If we could already push something based on the existing 2.21+1.4 into
unstable just to close existing bugs and implement the namespace
migration, it would be ideal. If you'll allow it by explicitly
authorizing me via this bug, I could push it as an NMU and find
someone to sponsor it.

For obvious reasons, I don't think that 3.0 would be accepted into
Wheezy, however.

Btw, about the deleted debian/watch:  it should be possible to
implement something that regularly checks the upstream Git tree for
changes in Git tags indicating new versions. It would be much better
than to delete the file.

Martin-Éric

2012/9/4 Christian Kastner <deb...@kvr.at>:
> Hello Martin-Éric,
>
> I incorporated your changes into the development version (3.0) back in
> June, but didn't make it in time (with sponsorship) before the Freeze. I
> then believed the overall changes to be too great for a freeze exception.
>
> Please feel free to NMU if you want. Alternatively, if you prefer, I
> could create a branch based on the current 2.21 and add your patch, plus
> any other changes you might want. For me, the main issue with this
> package is sponsorship...
>
> You can find the source repo here:
>     http://scm.kvr.at/git/?p=pkg-zd1211-firmware.git;a=shortlog
>
> Regards,
> Christian
>
> On 2012-09-01 15:59, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I submitted a patch to zd1211-firmware a while back. Since then, other
>> interesting issues have come up (disparity with the archive's
>> override, etc.), which I would also like to fix. I am thus hereby
>> asking you whether you would allow me to perform an NMU on this
>> package?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Martin-Éric
>


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to