On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 06:42:47PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 03:52:55PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: > > > > Maybe this ontology : > > http://github.com/nbarrientos/steamy/blob/master/ontologies/debian.owl > > could be a good candidate for representing package metadata in RDF. > > I think SPDX (http://spdx.org) would be an even better standard for package > identification. This would be natively linked to DEP5 efforts, as SPDX is > standardizing a lot on this (see http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/). >
ADMS.SW may provide useful ontology for Software Repository / Project / Package / Release description too, FWIW. HtH. [0] http://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/adms_foss/description -- Olivier BERGER http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8 Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF Institut Mines-Telecom, Telecom SudParis, Evry (France) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
