On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 04:46:53 +0100 Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 10:48 +0000, Yevgeny Kosarhevsky wrote: > > Package: src > > Version: 3.2.21-3 > > Severity: critical > > Justification: causes serious data loss > > What data? My peers reported packet loss. Switching back to 2.6.32 kernel solved the issue. > > Dear Maintainer, > > I get a heavy load on irq/23-eth0: > > 1086 root -51 0 0 0 0 S 2.0 0.0 0:31.04 irq/23-eth0 > > > > I don't think 2% CPU time is a 'heavy load'. > > > This is only occured after upgrading from 2.6.32 kernel. > > The LA was 0.00 on previous kernel, now it's 1.44 > [...] > > But you are not comparing like with like. On a real-time kernel, IRQ > handlers are scheduled as tasks and are accounted in the load average. > On a standard kernel as you were running before, IRQ handlers are > accounted separately. > > So, is there really a problem here? Did you actually mean to install a > real-time kernel? Since there was a packet loss, I think there is a problem. I don't know if it's related with > [ 1966.544292] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08 > [ 2108.848600] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08 -- Yevgeny Kosarzhevsky <phao...@gmail.com> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
