Michael Gilbert <michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com> (19/08/2012): > On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Michael Gilbert <mgilb...@debian.org> (18/08/2012): > >> Andrew hasn't yet made it clear which version he's been planning to > >> support in wheezy [0], but he did upload this one well before the > >> freeze. > > > > Nice try: > > [2012-07-01] Accepted 4.2.4-1 in unstable (low) (Andrew Pollock) > > Anyway, it was close.
“close” isn't exactly “well before” as you previously claimed. > I don't know whether 0330 UTC July 1 is before the exact time of the > freeze or not, but I do recall the packaging having an automatic > unblock (and a block-udeb) during the month of July. Perhaps you should read the freeze announce then? > Regardless, I don't really care which way the call on this goes, I > just need the call made so I can fix the right version. I don't see any reasons why the version currently sitting in testing would not be the version in wheezy. Which should answer your question I think. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
