On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, P. J. McDermott wrote: > I wonder if the gettext binary package should instead be split. Perhaps > gettext-runtime (M-A: same) should provide the libraries, gettext-tools > (M-A: foreign) should provide the tools, and gettext should be a > metapackage that depends on both of the former packages?
Please note that the Debian gettext source package currently in wheezy/sid generates all the following binary packages: gettext-base gettext gettext-el gettext-doc autopoint libgettextpo0 libasprintf0c2 Moreover, all the libraries which are meant to be used by other packages are already multi-arched and they are in their own package (the last two in the list above). So: What exactly did you mean by "split"? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
